Patrimonialism (from the Big Bad Bill)

Given the nature of what I have seen, I have to put this blurb out about the worst part of the big bad bill. That is the entrenchment and grand expansion of those individuals that will be carrying out the directives of whoever is running “ICE” as we now go forward.

I believe you can document from past behavior and written out exposes that what is being created in the United States has been recognized by written up analysis as a “Patrimonialist” form of government. There are many writings that explain the nature of this type of governing operation and it truly traces back to the earliest “get together” of humans as they tried to prevail against others, including all kinds of beings and other physical situations. In essence, it is one big family, and everyone genuflects (physically, emotionally, financially, and in any other way) to the father figure. It is easy to see and recognize and, like I say, people that do that stuff have documented how it operates.

That’s what we are working towards the United States now that this law has been passed, and Trump will be able to create a, distinct force of those who will enforce what ICE is and will be doing, will be allowed to expand as a result of the Bill, with any resistance being addressed by the military like set of employees, the cost of which are going to be astronomical as evidenced by the allowance for $$ in this bill. There is an express number set fourth and the bill. This is clearly right in the written “2025 manifesto.

For those that don’t understand this is a formalization of the same steps that were taken in Germany in the 30s. Patrimonialism is how Saudi Arabia is govern and essentially how Putin has governed Russia since he took over. There are many many other illustrations of this type of governing and I’m pretty sure it includes the Persians in the Iran part of the world.

This dance is expressly not permitted under The Constitution, but with the three justices that Trump appointed, I am not sure that the law is, being, and will be, applied in the absence of the Patrimonialism of which I write. heck, they could all be in it either directly or indirectly.

I have hopes that people will be smart enough to recognize this now and that it’s on the books, but I also realize that most people do not have the wherewithal to comprehend all of the factors until they are applied to them, and by that time, the only solution is some exigent circumstance that can upset the exercise of power that is presently being a as readily available by Stephen Miller. 

Our collective hope now must rest with the judicial system and the final hook that electing people to overturn this law is a main focus under the mechanisms we have available to us.